Jim: I found the second one down fascinating. Is it fun? Well by the look on the face of the woman spanking it's not but we can't see the face of the woman over her knee. Then I am intrigued by what she's sitting on. An interesting period photo without doubt.
Jim -- The vintage photos are a nice reminder that the interest in spanking between adults is nothing new
Susan -- Get a room, you two....lol She seems to be sitting on some kind of wheeled conveyance, but you can't really tell what it is. And I'm always intrigued by old photos like this where the spanker is plainly shown but the spankee's face is obscured or partially hidden or cut off. Is it done for privacy reasons--the spanker didn't mind being photographed, but the spankee did? Another thought that pops into my head--could the spankee be a man dressed as a woman, and showing the full face would give that away? Questions, questions...
I really enjoy your vintage that you found.enjoy your day.
ReplyDeleteJim
Jim: I found the second one down fascinating. Is it fun? Well by the look on the face of the woman spanking it's not but we can't see the face of the woman over her knee. Then I am intrigued by what she's sitting on. An interesting period photo without doubt.
ReplyDeleteJim -- The vintage photos are a nice reminder that the interest in spanking between adults is nothing new
ReplyDeleteSusan -- Get a room, you two....lol She seems to be sitting on some kind of wheeled conveyance, but you can't really tell what it is. And I'm always intrigued by old photos like this where the spanker is plainly shown but the spankee's face is obscured or partially hidden or cut off. Is it done for privacy reasons--the spanker didn't mind being photographed, but the spankee did? Another thought that pops into my head--could the spankee be a man dressed as a woman, and showing the full face would give that away? Questions, questions...